Thank you, I’m glad it helped connect those dots.
We used to ask 'Who' controls the AI, whether it’s a big tech CEO or a national government. But as this Llama-to-Avocado shift shows, relying on the 'Who' is a fragile strategy because interests and business models change.
The real shift in my thinking (and the heart of this essay) is that we have to focus on 'How' the architectural mandate. If the control isn't engineered into the system’s foundation, sovereignty is just a temporary lease.
I’ll be launching my book, 'HumanSovereigntyAI,' on Amazon soon which dives into these concepts in much greater depth. I hope you'll check it out when it's released if you're interested in exploring the blueprint further!
Thanks for writing this, it clarifies a lot. Kinda makes me think back to your discussions about realy who controls AI. Super insightful.
Thank you, I’m glad it helped connect those dots.
We used to ask 'Who' controls the AI, whether it’s a big tech CEO or a national government. But as this Llama-to-Avocado shift shows, relying on the 'Who' is a fragile strategy because interests and business models change.
The real shift in my thinking (and the heart of this essay) is that we have to focus on 'How' the architectural mandate. If the control isn't engineered into the system’s foundation, sovereignty is just a temporary lease.
I’ll be launching my book, 'HumanSovereigntyAI,' on Amazon soon which dives into these concepts in much greater depth. I hope you'll check it out when it's released if you're interested in exploring the blueprint further!